{"id":5419,"date":"2016-04-11T02:55:37","date_gmt":"2016-04-11T06:55:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/me-en.kaspersky.com\/blog\/?p=5419"},"modified":"2020-02-26T18:59:59","modified_gmt":"2020-02-26T14:59:59","slug":"facebook-privacy-issued","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/me-en.kaspersky.com\/blog\/facebook-privacy-issued\/5419\/","title":{"rendered":"Privacy wars flood Facebook"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In the first months of 2016 a number of European countries have stated that Facebook is behaving irresponsible when it comes to users\u2019 privacy. Facebook disagrees.<\/p>\n<p>In the beginning of February the French data protection authority proclaimed that Mark Zukerberg\u2019s social network\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.reuters.com\/article\/us-facebook-france-privacy-idUSKCN0VH1U1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">must stop tracking non-users<\/a>. A similar decision\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/technology\/2015\/nov\/10\/belgian-court-orders-facebook-to-stop-tracking-non-members\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">was made<\/a>\u00a0in 2015 in Belgium, and the Dutch, Spanish and German authorities are also launching their own investigation of this matter.<\/p>\n<p>According to the aforementioned research held by a French privacy regulator, CNIL, Facebook has decided that every person that opened the social network\u2019s website has agreed with its terms of service by default, even if these people were not logged in. The social network placed a cookie in the browser of every visitor without informing them. Using that cookie it traced their online behaviour to collect information that could be useful for online advertisement.<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"500\" data-dnt=\"true\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">Facebook must stop tracking non-users on the web: French regulator <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/iCPHl6Yki0\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">https:\/\/t.co\/iCPHl6Yki0<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\u2014 Reuters Tech News (@ReutersTech) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/ReutersTech\/status\/696774426508009472?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">February 8, 2016<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<p>CNIL also accused Facebook of collecting data about religion, political views and sexual orientation. This approach, as the regulator notes, \u201cviolates fundamental rights and interests of people, including their right for respect for private life.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>One month later the German consumer association\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.dailymail.co.uk\/sciencetech\/article-3484050\/Facebook-s-Like-button-violates-European-privacy-laws-Court-rules-feature-not-used-German-shopping-site.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">criticized<\/a>\u00a0the way some companies utilized Facebook\u2019s Like button plugin to gather and transfer browsing data to Facebook without warning the users. This was done automatically, even before a visitor \u201cLiked\u201d the page. Now all German state sites are obliged to remove this button.<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"500\" data-dnt=\"true\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">German court rules Facebook 'like' button violates data collection law <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/YIutBc8FAF\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">https:\/\/t.co\/YIutBc8FAF<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/HrSTufM1iX\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">pic.twitter.com\/HrSTufM1iX<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\u2014 RT (@RT_com) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/RT_com\/status\/708008271102222336?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">March 10, 2016<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<p>In a comment,\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.dailymail.co.uk\/sciencetech\/article-3484050\/Facebook-s-Like-button-violates-European-privacy-laws-Court-rules-feature-not-used-German-shopping-site.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">published<\/a>\u00a0by the Daily Mail, Facebook stated that the case is \u2018specific to a particular website and the way they have sought consent from their users in the past.\u2019 The Daily Mail also noted that statistics gathered by the social network cannot be used to personify anyone\u2019s identify, and that Facebook social plugins are designed not to set cookies for people who do not already have them.<\/p>\n<p>Earlier in March, German authorities asked the social network to\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.pcworld.com\/article\/237215\/germany_asks_facebook_to_disable_facial_recognition.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">shut down its facial recognition feature<\/a>, once again for the reasons of privacy. In January of 2016,\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.reuters.com\/article\/us-facebook-germany-idUSKCN0US27W20160114\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">German courts decided to aim at the Facebook\u2019s Friend Finder<\/a>\u00a0feature.<\/p>\n<p>When chosen, this options allowed the social network to access user\u2019s email contact list and send invites to those people who were not on Facebook yet. This practice\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.ibtimes.co.uk\/facebook-friend-finder-unlawful-advertising-harassment-says-german-court-1538132\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">received the name<\/a>\u00a0of \u201cadvertisement harassment.\u201d A lot of other services in Germany and around the globe have been using similar forms of advertising for many years so Facebook\u2019s case is only the tip of the iceberg.<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"500\" data-dnt=\"true\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\"><a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/Facebook?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">#Facebook<\/a> privacy settings u need to know: <a href=\"http:\/\/t.co\/XIFqPL6ckq\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">http:\/\/t.co\/XIFqPL6ckq<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/Tips?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">#Tips<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\u2014 Kaspersky Lab ME (@KasperskyME) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/KasperskyME\/status\/461047869344989185?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">April 29, 2014<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<p>On top of all the above mentioned troubles, in March a British daily newspaper, the Independent,\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.independent.co.uk\/life-style\/gadgets-and-tech\/news\/users-who-click-like-on-facebook-could-be-unwittingly-aiding-online-scammers-a6913956.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">condemned<\/a>\u00a0Facebook\u2019s Like algorithm. The newspaper states that it is quite popular among scammers, who use it to inflate a post and then add malicious attachments to the viral publications.<\/p>\n<p>As you might have noticed, popular posts are displayed high in the the news feed, that\u2019s why the \u201cLike farming\u201d approach helps scammers to cover broader audience. By the way, fraudsters follow the same practice when promoting malicious pages as well.<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"500\" data-dnt=\"true\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">Check your Facebook privacy settings NOW <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/32ZyKfSVgM\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">https:\/\/t.co\/32ZyKfSVgM<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/fvJ4RWVskL\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">pic.twitter.com\/fvJ4RWVskL<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\u2014 Kaspersky (@kaspersky) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/kaspersky\/status\/658723040008773632?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">October 26, 2015<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<p>Just like many other media outlets, the Independent is probably very well aware of the Facebook\u2019s rating algorithm. It\u2019s probably not very cool to observe as a decent analytical article gathers less likes and shares, than a cute photo of yet another little kitten.<\/p>\n<p>The case of Facebook shows that the online freedom era is coming close to its end and Internet is going to be strictly regulated. As world wide web enters every house, the governments want to control it. Besides, humanity doesn\u2019t have a solid and common legal basis which could let us decide together what\u2019s right or wrong in the online world.<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-pullquote\"><p>#Privacy wars flood #Facebook<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/share?url=https%3A%2F%2Fkas.pr%2Fs7kM&amp;text=%23Privacy+wars+flood+%23Facebook\" class=\"btn btn-twhite\" data-lang=\"en\" data-count=\"0\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">Tweet<\/a><\/blockquote>\n<p>Authorities across the globe suddenly remember about ancient Facebook features and fight for privacy, though usually\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.kaspersky.com\/blog\/apple-versus-fbi\/11381\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">they do quite the opposite<\/a>. Still the first to care about privacy and personal data is the user himself.<\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s why we highly recommend you to measure what you do and publish online and install a specialized solution, which will protect you from data collectors. For example,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/me.kaspersky.com\/en\/free-trials\/multi-device-security?redef=1&amp;reseller=me-en_kismdtribuild_trd_ona_smm__onl_b2c__lnk_______\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Kaspersky Internet Security<\/a>\u00a0has the built in\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.kaspersky.com\/blog\/enhanced-privacy-kaspersky-2016\/9562\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">Private Browsing feature<\/a>\u00a0that literally guarantees that your data won\u2019t leave your device without your permission.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In the first months of 2016 a number of European countries have stated that Facebook is behaving irresponsible when it comes to users\u2019 privacy. Facebook disagrees. In the beginning of<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":522,"featured_media":5420,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[20,1169,1170,1171,363,43,98],"class_list":{"0":"post-5419","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-news","8":"tag-facebook","9":"tag-france","10":"tag-germany","11":"tag-laws","12":"tag-personal-data","13":"tag-privacy","14":"tag-social-networks"},"hreflang":[{"hreflang":"en-ae","url":"https:\/\/me-en.kaspersky.com\/blog\/facebook-privacy-issued\/5419\/"},{"hreflang":"ar","url":"https:\/\/me.kaspersky.com\/blog\/facebook-privacy-issued\/3790\/"},{"hreflang":"en-us","url":"https:\/\/usa.kaspersky.com\/blog\/facebook-privacy-issued\/7009\/"},{"hreflang":"en-gb","url":"https:\/\/www.kaspersky.co.uk\/blog\/facebook-privacy-issued\/7033\/"},{"hreflang":"es-mx","url":"https:\/\/latam.kaspersky.com\/blog\/facebook-privacy-issued\/6964\/"},{"hreflang":"it","url":"https:\/\/www.kaspersky.it\/blog\/facebook-privacy-issued\/7938\/"},{"hreflang":"ru","url":"https:\/\/www.kaspersky.ru\/blog\/facebook-privacy-issued\/11569\/"},{"hreflang":"x-default","url":"https:\/\/www.kaspersky.com\/blog\/facebook-privacy-issued\/11814\/"},{"hreflang":"fr","url":"https:\/\/www.kaspersky.fr\/blog\/facebook-privacy-issued\/5528\/"},{"hreflang":"de","url":"https:\/\/www.kaspersky.de\/blog\/facebook-privacy-issued\/7483\/"},{"hreflang":"ja","url":"https:\/\/blog.kaspersky.co.jp\/facebook-privacy-issued\/11000\/"},{"hreflang":"ru-kz","url":"https:\/\/blog.kaspersky.kz\/facebook-privacy-issued\/11569\/"},{"hreflang":"en-au","url":"https:\/\/www.kaspersky.com.au\/blog\/facebook-privacy-issued\/11814\/"},{"hreflang":"en-za","url":"https:\/\/www.kaspersky.co.za\/blog\/facebook-privacy-issued\/11814\/"}],"acf":[],"banners":"","maintag":{"url":"https:\/\/me-en.kaspersky.com\/blog\/tag\/facebook\/","name":"Facebook"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/me-en.kaspersky.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5419","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/me-en.kaspersky.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/me-en.kaspersky.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/me-en.kaspersky.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/522"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/me-en.kaspersky.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5419"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/me-en.kaspersky.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5419\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16025,"href":"https:\/\/me-en.kaspersky.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5419\/revisions\/16025"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/me-en.kaspersky.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5420"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/me-en.kaspersky.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5419"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/me-en.kaspersky.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5419"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/me-en.kaspersky.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5419"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}